|
Also noted below is the process whereby progress against plans is reported on periodically with a final reporting out at year-end.
Process/Timeline
February (prior to fiscal year)
- Call for ideas that should /could be pursued the following fiscal year (current president). Reminder that submissions should be made within the context of the Strategic Plan. Call made to all of the executive, and liaison East and West (Liaison East and West could gather thoughts from chapters).
March/April (prior to fiscal year)
- Operational Planning meetings (chaired by the vice-president, with members including, president, past president and perhaps “incoming” vice-president.) Output would be prioritized operational plans – stated in the context of the Strategic Plan - for the upcoming fiscal year. Plans would describe who is accountable, a related timeframe and what is expected (along with performance measures) for each initiative.
May (Public Sector Management Workshop - PSMW)
- Current president formally table operational plan for the upcoming fiscal year.
June to May
- Implement plans. (responsible individual)
- Responsible individual would report on progress – ongoing and more formally at the end of the year.
- Discuss progress against plan at each executive and/or chapter meeting.
June to November
- Formulate final report on accomplishments against plan by responsible individual.
November (PD Week)
- Table report on accomplishments for past fiscal year (current president).
Ongoing Operational Planning Committee
Note that the operational planning process for a given year would span three fiscal years. For this reason, and given that the natural term of an FMI president (and other positions) is one year, it would be appropriate to have vice-president, president and past president (on an ongoing basis) constitute the operational planning committee. (maybe 2nd vice president as well).On an annual basis, the only change to the committee would be one of the 3 or 4 members (Past President being replaced).
Longer-range Perspective on Operational Plans
In order to ensure that there is some longer-range thinking in the planning process, the annual plan should have two sections.
- The first would be specific plans for the upcoming year (as discussed above).
- The second part would span the next two years and would be less tangible/specific than the first part. That is, each incoming president could articulate their individual perspectives on both 1) their term in the upcoming year and 2) their more long-range vision for the FMI. No future president would be bound by the 2 nd and 3 rd years in a given plan, but they would have the benefit of the thinking of past presidents.




